"You wasted $150,000 on an education you coulda got for a buck fifty in late charges at the public library." Will Hunting knew what he was talking about.
Not everyone has the time, desire or a small fortune to to get an MBA. But for a fraction of the price, you can get a business education by tapping into successful entrepreneurs and professors' knowledge.
Here are four of the best books to read on navigating the business world and starting your own company.
1. The Portable MBA
For those interested in an MBA but not sure.
The Portable MBA, written by University of Virginia's Darden School of Business professors, covers core business school topics. If you need a bird's eye view of a MBA program or just need a crash course in the basics of business, chapters cover everything from finance, accounting, marketing, economics to ethics, leadership and strategy. An easier read than some MBA books, this is a great place to start if you are interested in business or an MBA.
2. The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win
For those looking at starting a business.
The core of Four Steps to the Epiphany is the base for the Lean Start Up method. Silicon Valley entrepreneur and Stanford professor Steve Blank argues that startups should focus on customer development rather than solely product development. Blank points to several traps that companies fall into causing them to fail. The customer-centric theory is a key point in successfully selling an idea before spending on marketing or scaling. This book is filled with examples, charts and illustrations to show how to turn a startup in to a company.
3. The Personal MBA
For those interested the basics of business.
This is a more in-depth look into business practices, which translates well into real-world application. Broad business concepts like starting a new business and actually running a business are major themes. Learn to evaluate a market, different forms of value, the Iron Law of the market, pricing uncertainty principle and ways to increase revenue. For an added bonus, visit author Josh Kaufman's website for a list of 100 of the best business books and his TEDX talk on the first 20 Hours of an MBA.
4. Bootstrapping
For those starting a business with limited funds.
When your company is not blessed with unlimited funds or an angel investor, bootstrapping is essential to getting started. Bootstrapping or starting a business without external venture capital requires creatively using internal cash flow. Entrepreneurial Mind CEO and co-founder Jeff Cornwall explores thriving on a limited budget through various techniques. The book teaches strict control of finances as well as process efficiency, cash-flow-management, human resources and long-term bootstrapping.
Four More Recommended Reads:
The Lean Start Up by Eric Ries (A student of Steve Blank)
How to Read a Financial Report by John A. Tracy
Getting Things Done by David Allen
Financial Intelligence for Entrepreneurs by Karen Berman and Joe Knight
Joe Biden, the Student Loan Crisis, and the Problem with Economic Stimulus
November 20 | 2020
Last week, for the first time since the stock market began its precipitous fall in February, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stabilized above 29,000 points.
By Monday, November 16th, the Dow had surpassed all previous records, closing at 29,950. Meanwhile, the national death rate as a result of COVID-19 is as high as it's been since May. Meanwhile, working Americans continue to struggle and suffer, wasting their gas money waiting in endless lines for limited supplies of free food.
<p>If you, like <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/266807/percentage-americans-owns-stock.aspx" target="_blank">nearly half of U.S. adults, don't own any stock at all</a>, the numbers above are essentially meaningless. Even for most of the people who are invested in the stock market, their investment isn't substantial enough to make up for issues like <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/millions-of-workers-underemployed-as-virus-surges-prompt-closures.html" target="_blank">widespread underemployment.</a><br></p><p>And yet, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/investing/stocks-market-fed-overnight-lending-rescue/index.html" target="_blank">the Federal Reserve has poured $4 trillion into maintaining the stability of investment markets</a> and ensuring that the Dow, the S&P 500 and various other numbers on charts that seem increasingly disconnected from reality move in the right direction. Why is that?</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-131"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent2 - long_content --></p><div id="c786e" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="ce78aefbea7293933fb97ac5fa2a12a7"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1329252993733185539" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">30 million people in this country are at risk of eviction.
Millions of people are unemployed or underemployed from… https://t.co/pWGQY94iJT</div> — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)<a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/statuses/1329252993733185539">1605753584.0</a></blockquote></div><p></p><p>The answer to that question is complicated, but it is closely linked to the reason why President-Elect Joe Biden is currently on the receiving end of a lot of scrutiny and pushback on the topic of student loan forgiveness.<br></p><p>Recently the amount of <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-17-trillion-question-that-did-not-come-up-during-trump-biden-presidential-debate-2020-09-30" target="_blank">student loan debt in the United States surpassed $1.7 trillion</a>. That amount has more than <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/bloombergs-plan-to-tackle-the-1point7-trillion-student-loan-crisis.html" target="_blank">tripled in the last 15 years</a>, with around 45 million Americans currently holding some amount of student loan debt, and an average burden in excess of $30,000.</p><p>Most of that debt is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/your-money/student-loans-bankruptcy.html" target="_blank">nearly impossible to discharge through the standard bankruptcy process</a>. And the fact that most of that burden falls on young people — whose careers are less established and who face generational declines in wages and wealth — exacerbates the impact of that debt. It's a major factor in <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/09/millions-of-millennials-are-locked-out-of-homeownership-heres-why.html" target="_blank">the worrying declines in rates of home ownership, marriage, and birth rate among millennials</a>.</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-133"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent3 - longer_content --></p><p>It is widely acknowledged that the cost of higher education has ballooned out of control while it has increasingly been pushed as a necessary step on the path to prosperity. Underlying this problem is the fact that — <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32821678" target="_blank">unlike many developed nations</a> — our federal government doesn't offer affordable public universities or fund education in fields like medicine and engineering where we always need more skilled professionals.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6c2ef0b20491d7e8b536d4cedead72e7"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z87xyYAshtA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Why Is College So Expensive in America? | Making Cents | NowThis</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z87xyYAshtA" target="_blank">www.youtube.com</a>
</small>
</p><p>Instead we offer government-backed loans and guarantees that incentivize institutions to invest in administrative bloat and in expensive development projects to enhance their prestige and entice prospective students with unnecessary luxuries. Teenagers instilled with little sense of the financial commitments — but an unwavering belief in the necessity of college — have become cash cows.</p><p>The system as it stands is clearly broken, and whatever other reforms are called for, the resulting debt crisis is interfering with the spending power and attainment of an entire generation. In the context of a pandemic that has affected the livelihoods of so many, it would seem like an uncontroversial act for the government to alleviate some of that burden of student debt.<br></p><p>And for the most part, it is. Opinion polling shows that the notion of <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2020/09/25/new-poll-shows-substantial-bipartisan-support-for-student-loan-forgiveness-and-other-relief-for-borrowers/?sh=14602aa12b7c" target="_blank">providing some amount of student loan forgiveness is broadly popular</a> across partisan lines.</p><p>The exception is among the pundit class — and the wealthy donors they represent. Because, as various political figures — including <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/16/schumer-suggests-student-debt-forgiveness-through-executive-order.html" target="_blank">Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren</a> — have begun urging Joe Biden to make student loan forgiveness an early focus of his presidency, others in politics and the news media have done their best to push back.</p><div id="d17b3" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="2e3f727d707e9312d1023e111a6db655"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1143504500914884608" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">When you say #cancelstudentdebt, you’re saying a minority of people who had the advantage of obtaining a degree sho… https://t.co/BMbhxUHAbK</div> — Dan Crenshaw (@Dan Crenshaw)<a href="https://twitter.com/DanCrenshawTX/statuses/1143504500914884608">1561467692.0</a></blockquote></div><p>At the moment, a forbearance measure laid out in the CARES act has been extended through the remainder of 2020 — allowing those with federal student loans to defer payments for the time being. But further action being proposed would include forgiveness for debt owed to private companies.<br></p><p>Among the wide range of suggestions are legislation to provide <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/23/biden-proposes-forgiving-10000-in-student-debt-for-public-service.html" target="_blank">$10,000 of debt forgiveness for individuals meeting certain restrictive criteria</a> and $50,000 of automatic forgiveness for all student debt holders — delivered through an executive order as soon as Joe Biden assumes the White House.</p><p>In either case, some would still be left with large burdens of debt, and some would likely be hit with unmanageable tax bills — as debt forgiveness is considered a form of income. But the debate has not largely involved addressing those shortcomings. Rather, many have questioned whether we should be considering these proposals at all.</p><p></p><p><strong>The objections tend to fall into three categories: It wouldn't help the right people, it wouldn't stimulate the economy as much as other measures, and "I paid off my student loans, so why shouldn't they?"</strong></p><p>The last is patently asinine, and should be ignored or mocked as it applies equally to any form of progress — "My face healed after smashing against the dashboard, so why should we add airbags now?" If the people espousing this perspective want to be acknowledged for their fiscal responsibility, here's the entirety of the praise they deserve: Good for you.</p><p>The fact remains that many people are not able to pay off their student loan debts, which can have a ruinous effect on their credit rating, affecting everything from interest rates on other loans to — in a cruel twist — <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/select/can-employers-see-your-credit-score/" target="_blank">their employment prospects</a>. There is a disturbing potential for an accelerating debt cycle that becomes impossible to escape.</p><div id="1d226" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f031972cfe91ea552f9cee44e0d553ad"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1328480231993249796" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">“Things were bad for me, so they should stay bad for everyone else” is not a good argument against debt cancellatio… https://t.co/yyC60K5Uyz</div> — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)<a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/statuses/1328480231993249796">1605569343.0</a></blockquote></div><p>Even for those who are able to pay off their debts may feel pressured by the monthly payments to accept employment that they otherwise wouldn't — contributing to an imbalance in the employee-employer relationship that could further suppress wages. In short, it's bad.<br></p><p>So while it's valid to point out that there are others in the economy more in need than college graduates, we can't ignore the reality of the student debt crisis. Along with other important measures — further extension and expansion of unemployment benefits, rent subsidies, and direct payments to make it easier for people to stay home — student loan forgiveness should be considered an essential part of COVID relief.</p><p>Which leaves only one complaint left: It wouldn't do enough to stimulate the economy.</p><p>The basic issue is that the benefit of debt forgiveness is spread out over years or decades of remaining loan payments. And because it would also contribute to recipient's tax burdens, there is a concern that much of the cost of debt relief would not result in short term increases in consumer spending — the kind that spurs quick economic growth.</p><p>While that's worth being aware of, doesn't this objection have its priorities reversed? Isn't the entire purpose of a strong economy to improve people's lives? So why are we unwilling to improve people's lives unless it primarily contributes to short term economic growth?</p><p></p><p>Clearly our entire system has embraced this inverted way of thinking. That's why it can pass almost without notice when the Federal Reserve spends $4 trillion to prop up investment markets.</p><p>We happily spend that amount on measures that only directly benefit the wealthy, and yet — when it's suggested that we should spend a fraction of that on a popular policy that could improve the lives of 45 million Americans — it becomes a point of great contention.</p><h2></h2><p>We all seem to have forgotten the essential truth that the economy is meant to serve us — not the other way around.</p>
Keep reading
Show less
Joe Biden, the Student Loan Crisis, and the Problem with Economic Stimulus
November 20 | 2020
Last week, for the first time since the stock market began its precipitous fall in February, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stabilized above 29,000 points.
By Monday, November 16th, the Dow had surpassed all previous records, closing at 29,950. Meanwhile, the national death rate as a result of COVID-19 is as high as it's been since May. Meanwhile, working Americans continue to struggle and suffer, wasting their gas money waiting in endless lines for limited supplies of free food.
<p>If you, like <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/266807/percentage-americans-owns-stock.aspx" target="_blank">nearly half of U.S. adults, don't own any stock at all</a>, the numbers above are essentially meaningless. Even for most of the people who are invested in the stock market, their investment isn't substantial enough to make up for issues like <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/millions-of-workers-underemployed-as-virus-surges-prompt-closures.html" target="_blank">widespread underemployment.</a><br></p><p>And yet, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/investing/stocks-market-fed-overnight-lending-rescue/index.html" target="_blank">the Federal Reserve has poured $4 trillion into maintaining the stability of investment markets</a> and ensuring that the Dow, the S&P 500 and various other numbers on charts that seem increasingly disconnected from reality move in the right direction. Why is that?</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-131"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent2 - long_content --></p><div id="c786e" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="ce78aefbea7293933fb97ac5fa2a12a7"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1329252993733185539" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">30 million people in this country are at risk of eviction.
Millions of people are unemployed or underemployed from… https://t.co/pWGQY94iJT</div> — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)<a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/statuses/1329252993733185539">1605753584.0</a></blockquote></div><p></p><p>The answer to that question is complicated, but it is closely linked to the reason why President-Elect Joe Biden is currently on the receiving end of a lot of scrutiny and pushback on the topic of student loan forgiveness.<br></p><p>Recently the amount of <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-17-trillion-question-that-did-not-come-up-during-trump-biden-presidential-debate-2020-09-30" target="_blank">student loan debt in the United States surpassed $1.7 trillion</a>. That amount has more than <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/bloombergs-plan-to-tackle-the-1point7-trillion-student-loan-crisis.html" target="_blank">tripled in the last 15 years</a>, with around 45 million Americans currently holding some amount of student loan debt, and an average burden in excess of $30,000.</p><p>Most of that debt is <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/your-money/student-loans-bankruptcy.html" target="_blank">nearly impossible to discharge through the standard bankruptcy process</a>. And the fact that most of that burden falls on young people — whose careers are less established and who face generational declines in wages and wealth — exacerbates the impact of that debt. It's a major factor in <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/09/millions-of-millennials-are-locked-out-of-homeownership-heres-why.html" target="_blank">the worrying declines in rates of home ownership, marriage, and birth rate among millennials</a>.</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-133"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent3 - longer_content --></p><p>It is widely acknowledged that the cost of higher education has ballooned out of control while it has increasingly been pushed as a necessary step on the path to prosperity. Underlying this problem is the fact that — <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32821678" target="_blank">unlike many developed nations</a> — our federal government doesn't offer affordable public universities or fund education in fields like medicine and engineering where we always need more skilled professionals.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6c2ef0b20491d7e8b536d4cedead72e7"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Z87xyYAshtA?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Why Is College So Expensive in America? | Making Cents | NowThis</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z87xyYAshtA" target="_blank">www.youtube.com</a>
</small>
</p><p>Instead we offer government-backed loans and guarantees that incentivize institutions to invest in administrative bloat and in expensive development projects to enhance their prestige and entice prospective students with unnecessary luxuries. Teenagers instilled with little sense of the financial commitments — but an unwavering belief in the necessity of college — have become cash cows.</p><p>The system as it stands is clearly broken, and whatever other reforms are called for, the resulting debt crisis is interfering with the spending power and attainment of an entire generation. In the context of a pandemic that has affected the livelihoods of so many, it would seem like an uncontroversial act for the government to alleviate some of that burden of student debt.<br></p><p>And for the most part, it is. Opinion polling shows that the notion of <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2020/09/25/new-poll-shows-substantial-bipartisan-support-for-student-loan-forgiveness-and-other-relief-for-borrowers/?sh=14602aa12b7c" target="_blank">providing some amount of student loan forgiveness is broadly popular</a> across partisan lines.</p><p>The exception is among the pundit class — and the wealthy donors they represent. Because, as various political figures — including <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/16/schumer-suggests-student-debt-forgiveness-through-executive-order.html" target="_blank">Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren</a> — have begun urging Joe Biden to make student loan forgiveness an early focus of his presidency, others in politics and the news media have done their best to push back.</p><div id="d17b3" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="2e3f727d707e9312d1023e111a6db655"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1143504500914884608" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">When you say #cancelstudentdebt, you’re saying a minority of people who had the advantage of obtaining a degree sho… https://t.co/BMbhxUHAbK</div> — Dan Crenshaw (@Dan Crenshaw)<a href="https://twitter.com/DanCrenshawTX/statuses/1143504500914884608">1561467692.0</a></blockquote></div><p>At the moment, a forbearance measure laid out in the CARES act has been extended through the remainder of 2020 — allowing those with federal student loans to defer payments for the time being. But further action being proposed would include forgiveness for debt owed to private companies.<br></p><p>Among the wide range of suggestions are legislation to provide <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/23/biden-proposes-forgiving-10000-in-student-debt-for-public-service.html" target="_blank">$10,000 of debt forgiveness for individuals meeting certain restrictive criteria</a> and $50,000 of automatic forgiveness for all student debt holders — delivered through an executive order as soon as Joe Biden assumes the White House.</p><p>In either case, some would still be left with large burdens of debt, and some would likely be hit with unmanageable tax bills — as debt forgiveness is considered a form of income. But the debate has not largely involved addressing those shortcomings. Rather, many have questioned whether we should be considering these proposals at all.</p><p></p><p><strong>The objections tend to fall into three categories: It wouldn't help the right people, it wouldn't stimulate the economy as much as other measures, and "I paid off my student loans, so why shouldn't they?"</strong></p><p>The last is patently asinine, and should be ignored or mocked as it applies equally to any form of progress — "My face healed after smashing against the dashboard, so why should we add airbags now?" If the people espousing this perspective want to be acknowledged for their fiscal responsibility, here's the entirety of the praise they deserve: Good for you.</p><p>The fact remains that many people are not able to pay off their student loan debts, which can have a ruinous effect on their credit rating, affecting everything from interest rates on other loans to — in a cruel twist — <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/select/can-employers-see-your-credit-score/" target="_blank">their employment prospects</a>. There is a disturbing potential for an accelerating debt cycle that becomes impossible to escape.</p><div id="1d226" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f031972cfe91ea552f9cee44e0d553ad"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1328480231993249796" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">“Things were bad for me, so they should stay bad for everyone else” is not a good argument against debt cancellatio… https://t.co/yyC60K5Uyz</div> — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)<a href="https://twitter.com/AOC/statuses/1328480231993249796">1605569343.0</a></blockquote></div><p>Even for those who are able to pay off their debts may feel pressured by the monthly payments to accept employment that they otherwise wouldn't — contributing to an imbalance in the employee-employer relationship that could further suppress wages. In short, it's bad.<br></p><p>So while it's valid to point out that there are others in the economy more in need than college graduates, we can't ignore the reality of the student debt crisis. Along with other important measures — further extension and expansion of unemployment benefits, rent subsidies, and direct payments to make it easier for people to stay home — student loan forgiveness should be considered an essential part of COVID relief.</p><p>Which leaves only one complaint left: It wouldn't do enough to stimulate the economy.</p><p>The basic issue is that the benefit of debt forgiveness is spread out over years or decades of remaining loan payments. And because it would also contribute to recipient's tax burdens, there is a concern that much of the cost of debt relief would not result in short term increases in consumer spending — the kind that spurs quick economic growth.</p><p>While that's worth being aware of, doesn't this objection have its priorities reversed? Isn't the entire purpose of a strong economy to improve people's lives? So why are we unwilling to improve people's lives unless it primarily contributes to short term economic growth?</p><p></p><p>Clearly our entire system has embraced this inverted way of thinking. That's why it can pass almost without notice when the Federal Reserve spends $4 trillion to prop up investment markets.</p><p>We happily spend that amount on measures that only directly benefit the wealthy, and yet — when it's suggested that we should spend a fraction of that on a popular policy that could improve the lives of 45 million Americans — it becomes a point of great contention.</p><h2></h2><p>We all seem to have forgotten the essential truth that the economy is meant to serve us — not the other way around.</p>
Keep reading
Show less
Boeing's 737 MAX is to take to the skies once more after the go-ahead from the FAA, fueling the stock's rise.
Shares of Boeing (BA) have continued to climb this month, rising over 33% from their October 30th closing of $144.39, and have continued to climb this week.
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image">
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDc5MDcyMi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2MzE2MTg4OH0.QM6tsXHRjXKbzrUKNi0OUJN515zqPjRZvkI25XEjljE/img.jpg?width=980" id="6a1e7" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="51a89b0b4d9d6a00bd4f0a11e39e6c5b" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="Boeing stock value">
</p><p><br></p><p>There are a few key events contributing to this rapid rise in the stock:</p><p>1. October's quarterly report unveiled further job cuts, for the airline as well as a smaller-than-expected loss. Losses were $1.39 a share, beating out expected losses of $2.47 a share. Headcount will also shrink by <a href="http://www.fi-aeroweb.com/US-Commercial-Aircraft-Fleet.html" target="_blank">11,000.</a> Even in one of the worst markets for travel stocks in decades, investors appear to be confident in the company's long-term prospects.</p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-129"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent1 - mid_content --></p><p></p><center><script async="" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script><!-- Popdust Mobile Banner 320x100 --><ins class="adsbygoogle" style="display:inline-block;width:320px;height:100px" data-ad-client="ca-pub-4301469008561137" data-ad-slot="6952751205"></ins><script>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
</script></center><p></p><p>2. With multiple COVID-19 vaccine trials reporting positive results, investors are starting to eye a post-coronavirus world where pent-up demand for travel will see millions taking to the skies. With Boeing still the market-leader in US commercial aircraft, expect that demand to trickle down to the airplane manufacturer's bottom line.</p><p>3. With the FAA clearing the 737 MAX to fly after two fatal crashes, the plane is expected to become a hot commodity once more. The planes have been grounded for 20 months while Boeing made changes to software, design, and training to reassure customers, and airlines are eager to get them flying once more. </p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-131"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent2 - long_content --></p><p>The 737 MAX has a longer range and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/business/boeing-737-max-faa.html" target="_blank">burns 14% less fuel</a> than Boeing's previous 737 NG, making it a strong choice for airlines' long-distance and trans-continental routes. Alaska Airlines and Ryanair are both expected to take MAX deliveries in a matter of months and US passengers could be prepared to fly in already-delivered planes as early as late December.</p><p><strong>That's not to say Boeing's rapid rise will continue.</strong> These vaccines are still awaiting FDA approval and the 737 Max still needs clearance from air safety regulators internationally including Transport Canada, Civil Aviation Administration of China, and the European Aviation Safety Agency. </p><p><div id="ezoic-pub-ad-placeholder-133"></div>
<!-- End Ezoic - incontent3 - longer_content --></p><p>Meanwhile, it may be an uphill battle for passengers to board a plane again after COVID-19, not the least on an airplane model that dominated the headlines following the <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/boeing-posts-n..." target="_blank">crashes of Lion Air Flight 610</a> and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302.</p><p>Positive news in the last month has allowed Boeing's stock to soar. The real question is how long will it stay up?</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Keep reading
Show less
